Connect with us


Now the Hate is Coming from Inside Congress



One of the most troubling people ever elected to the U.S. Congress, at least during our lifetimes, is Rashida Tlaib (D-MI, District 12). She first became famous the night she was elected in 2018 by bragging that “we’re going to impeach the motherf****r,” referring to this country’s duly-elected president. She later proudly endorsed T-shirts printed with that infantile taunt. (Disgracefully, she also ran unopposed.)

But beyond her unhinged, juvenile conduct, the more you learn about her, the more afraid you ought to be. Her rap sheet of troubling behavior and connections has appeared elsewhere, but not recently, and generally not in one place. This is a person who should always be “in the news.”

Firstly, the circumstances of her candidacy are problematic. In addition to possible past offences, as of November of 2019, she was being investigated by the House Ethics Committee for campaign finance violations. The official report submitted to the Committee is unequivocal: she paid herself a total of $45,500 through her campaign — supposedly for “covering childcare expenses,” as she told CNN. Will she face any kind of punishment for this in the future? We don’t know.

This aside, Tlaib — a “Palestinian” whose district not surprisingly includes Muslim-majority Dearborn, Michigan — has a long history of connections not only to anti-Jewish bigots but also to actual Islamic terrorists, from whom she has never formally dissociated herself.

In 2006, she wrote an article for vile anti-Semitic racist Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam newspaper, The Final Call. In 2009, she received a Community Service Award from the Michigan branch of CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which was exposed in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation trial for funding Hamas. Not only that, between 2013 and 2014, when she was a Michigan state representative, she received $9,465 in donations from members of CAIR as well as other Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated groups. Then, when she ran for Congress in 2018, members of many of the same organizations donated a total of $28,544 to her campaign.

Her connections are also more personal. In 2015, she tweeted out an article from The Nation entitled, “Why Black Lives Matter Activists Are Showing Up for a Palestinian Woman Threatened With Deportation.” The woman in question was Rasmeah Odeh, a member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), who was involved in a 1969 terrorist bombing which murdered two Israeli college students. She later made her way to the U.S. while committing immigration fraud. (Despite BLM’s efforts, she was indeed deported back to Jordan.)

Odeh is also a dear friend of Jew-hating former Women’s March chair Linda Sarsour. Among much, much more, Sarsour has subtly declared stealth jihad against President Trump, had family and friends in prison in Israel for terrorism, and has expressed support for Palestinian terrorist Muhammad Allan. Tlaib happily promoted Sarsour’s book recently while wearing a shirt depicting “Palestine” where Israel should be.

Then there is Abbas Hamideh. Hamideh is a founding member of al-Awdah, the Palestinian Right of Return Coalition, an anti-Jewish organization proclaiming that Arab “refugees” have the “right” to “return” to their “occupied” land (therefore deliberately swamping out Israel’s Jewish population). He has enthusiastically tweeted support for the Iran-backed terrorist organization Hizbullah and for its murderous leader Sayid Hassan Nasrallah. There is an infamous picture of Tlaib posing with him at an official dinner party in her honor.

In the summer of 2019, Tlaib attempted to cause an international incident by shunning a congressional trip to Israel because it would not tour said “occupied” areas. Though she said she simply wanted to visit her 90-year-old grandmother in her ancestral village, her actual motives were very different. Both she and her fellow Islamic operative representative, Ilhan Omar (D-MN, District 5), had actually planned an independent trip with MIFTAH, a virulently anti-Semitic organization which even published an American neo-Nazi rant about Jewish world domination. Also, both Tlaib and Omar support the anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement. BDS is a campaign of economic and political terrorism against Israel, arguably America’s strongest and closest ally on earth. Israel made it illegal in 2017 for any non-citizen to enter the country who advocates its destruction in any way; therefore, both congresswomen were deservedly banned from entering.

Tlaib has also demonstrated her direct disloyalty to this country by draping herself in the Palestinian flag when she won the Michigan Democratic congressional primary in 2018. In fact, the very day she was sworn in, she summed up her entire future political career before it even began. In a characteristically childish act of contempt for the civilized world, another dear friend of hers, Jew-hating “comedian” Amer Zahr, noticed, as he then tweeted, that “there was something wrong” with the world map in Tlaib’s new congressional office. Then, to his friend Rashida’s obvious delight, he placed a white sticky note with “Palestine” written on it in red upon the map, drawing an arrow pointing at the planet’s only Jewish state.

There is only one reason a woman like this gets elected to national office, and it is not to dutifully serve her country. If indeed she actually considered America to be her country, she would have draped herself in the American flag, as plenty of proud second-generation immigrants do in an inclusive, color-blind society like ours.

Given her deeply disturbing connections to Islamic terrorism and anti-Jewish racists, her allegiances are obviously to those people’s ideologies and actions and not to the Constitution she so cheerfully swore on a Qur’an to “support and defend.” And that should scare you.

By Barry Nussbaum, Son of Auschwitz survivors, Founder American Truth Project, Foreign and Domestic Policy Commentator

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Have We Forgotten What Happened On 9/11?



Continue Reading


Sharia in the U.S. Judicial System?




The U.S. Senate’s recent confirmation of Zahid Quraishi as America’s first Muslim federal judge to a lifetime position on the District Court of New Jersey raises some concerning questions.

First and foremost, there is the question of his faith. Does it matter if Zahid Quraishi is a Muslim? The Left would, of course, maintain that raising the Muslim identity of Quraishi is racist, bigoted and “Islamophobic.” But those who understand the reality of Sharia – and the fact that Islam is not a race — understand that this matter is more complicated than what might first meet the eye.

It may very well matter if Quraishi is not just a Muslim “by name” – or just a “secular Muslim” by birth heritage. Indeed, if, as an adult adherent to Islam, he devoutly recites the Shahada — “There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah” – then Quraishi’s Muslimness could matter very much. That’s because it could indicate whether or not Quraishi would ever uphold aspects of Sharia – Islamic law – in his legal rulings.

As a survivor of Sharia law, I can tell you: Sharia matters — and in the most horrendous and painful of ways.

It is vital to understand that in Islam, Allah’s Law is supreme for Muslims, above all other laws and legal systems. And that poses a problem for America when Islam resides on its territory, because Sharia is completely incompatible with the U.S. Constitution and the foundations of a free society.

Quraishi’s relationship to Islam, therefore, matters a great deal — seeing that his new position entails significant power and influence in America.

So let’s dig a little bit deeper on Quraishi.

The Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) surprisingly did not come out and cheer Quraishi’s appointment — as one might have expected them to do. Instead, the Muslim “civil rights” organization appeared to be quite furious about him. Zahra Billoo, head of CAIR’s San Francisco branch, issued a statement affirming that she “would much rather have a white Christian judge with progressive values… It’s not enough that he is Muslim. In fact, it’s insulting.”

It appears that the problem for Billoo and CAIR is that Quraishi is not a Muslim from an apparent “list” of “20 to 50 Muslims who have been in the fight” for “social justice.” One unnamed Muslim politician who complained to Slate magazine about Quraishi’s appointment echoed the same theme: “We don’t know what his stances are on civil rights because you can’t find one article or anything that he’s written publicly about the Muslim struggle in the last 20 years post-9/11.”

For those concerned about Quraishi’s potential ties to Sharia, this negative disposition from the “Sharia camp” toward the Muslim judge might appear to be good news. But is it?

CAIR’s concern about Quraishi’s supposed lack of support for “progressive values” appears to be a good sign in light of CAIR’s own record of opposing counterterror measures and slandering opponents of jihad and Sharia tyranny. However, CAIR’s disposition toward Quraishi tells us little, if anything, about the key issue at stake: does the judge hold Islamic values or not?

The narrative takes another peculiar twist when we examine what transpired during Quraishi’s questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee: When asked by Committee Chair, Democrat Senator Dick Durbin: “What do you know about Sharia law?” Quraishi answered that he knew “nothing about Sharia.


Quraishi knows “nothing” about Islam or Islamic Law?

Christine Douglass-Williams has commented on Quraishi’s dubious answer:

“Virtually everyone knows something about the Sharia. In his position, Quraishi is likely to know a lot, and was probably fibbing, and not in an intelligent way, either. It isn’t possible that a man of his standing, who ‘has served as a military prosecutor and Army captain in Iraq, as an assistant U.S. Attorney who has tried cases of public corruption, organized crime and financial fraud, and as a white-collar criminal defense lawyer’, would know ‘NOTHING’ about Sharia.”

True indeed.

What makes the matter even more peculiar is that when one pulls up Quraishi’s questionnaire answers for the Senate Judiciary Committee, one finds that he is mentioned as a “Muslim” many times in his “Honors and Awards” list. So Quraishi is praised, rewarded and held in acclaim by the Muslim community for his achievements in light of his Muslimness, but he personally doesn’t know anything about Islamic law at all?

Could it be that Quraishi might actually not be the incidental Muslim he postures as being? Could it be that he has been recognized and awarded by important prominent Muslim organizations because they gauged that, among other things, he actually is somewhat of an adherent Muslim after all?

Is it possible that CAIR might really not be as upset as it is claiming to be about Quraishi’s appointment? Or maybe it is upset, but not for the reasons it has given? Could it also be that certain players involved in this narrative are engaging in some form of taqiyya – the command in Islam for Muslims to deceive non-Muslims?

Would it also be out of bounds to ask: even if Quraishi is not an adherent Muslim, is it legitimate to be concerned that he one day could become one?

It is vital to stress at this point that Islam is not just a “religion” the way that Christianity and Judaism are religions. Islam is much more than a “faith.” For example, like Judaism, Islam has a legal system — but Islamic Law extends far beyond any Judaic (or even secular) legal system. Sharia embodies all the commands of Allah and all the examples of Muhammad-as divine law that must be implemented in all areas of life.

Qur’an 33:21 is just one verse of many that confirms that Muhammad is “an excellent pattern” for Muslims to follow. It would do well for people to keep in mind that the “excellent” examples that Mohammed set for his followers included the following: marrying a six-year-old girl, A’ishah, and having sex with her when she was nine (Sahih al-Bukhari 5134); encouraging rape of female captives (Qur’an 4:24); stating that women are stupid (Qur’an 2:282) and that hell is comprised of mostly women (Bukhari 29); commanding men to beat their wives (Qur’an 4:34); and being merciless to a woman who had been beaten so brutally that her bruise was green (Bukhari 5825).

Muhammad also disparaged black people (Bukhari 7038). He murdered between 600 and 900 Jews in one battle, and then distributed the captive women as sex slaves (Ibn Ishaq, pp. 464, 511-512).

With some of these matters in mind, the question surfaces: would or could an American Muslim federal judge consider such material as a basis for his rulings? According to Islamic law, a Muslim judge must do so. Sharia mandates that no true Muslim is obligated to obey the laws of a non-Muslim country. Qur’an 33:1 commands to “not obey the disbelievers and the hypocrites.” Qur’an 4:60 says that those who “refer legislation” to the non-Muslims are led “far astray.” And Qur’an 9:3 says that “Allah is disassociated from the disbelievers, and [so is] His Messenger.” According to Islamic tradition, the revelation of that last verse allowed Muhammad to break the Treaty of al-Hudaibiyah.

Let us be clear: an American judge who follows Muhammad’s example can take an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution, and not really mean it. In fact, Muhammad instructs such a judge exactly what to do in this situation: “if I take an oath and later find something else better than that, then I do what is better and expiate my oath.” (Bukhari 5518)

The supremacy of Islamic Law over all other laws still applies today. The Islamic website International Shariah Movement is run by certified Islamic scholars. Its post “Obey the Law of the Land?” cites Qur’an 33:1.

Under Sharia, if a woman is raped, a Muslim judge must disregard any forensic or non-witness evidence, because Qur’an 24:13 requires “four male witnesses” for a rape conviction.

A beaten woman may also easily be denied divorce, because Qur’an 4:34 commands that “Men are in charge of women,” and so may “strike them.”

That is exactly what a Muslim judge in an Iranian Islamic court told me personally when I was a 15-year-old child bride, desperate for a divorce to escape the beatings. In fact, a beaten woman who leaves Islam must be hunted down and murdered, according to Islamic law, because Muhammad said, “Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.” (Bukhari 6922)

With all these realities in mind, it is clear that if we cannot at least ask Judge Zahid Quraishi some questions regarding his adherence, or non-adherence, to Islamic law, or even understand that the issue of Quraishi’s Muslimness is an important one to address, then America is in deep trouble.

As an individual who suffered under Sharia, and was able to escape its monstrous clutches, I strongly encourage my fellow Americans to ask the right questions in this vital – and troubling – narrative about America’s new federal judge.

Continue Reading


Iran Elects Mass Murderer as Next President




The ‘election’ for president is over in Iran. The grand ayatollah handpicked Ebrahim Raisi who was then ‘elected’. He’s not just a hardline jihadist, but he’s a mass murderer and a big-time one. And more importantly, he’s very proud of his background.

He’s accused by the world of having personally supervised the trials and executions of somewhere between 5,000 and 40,000 Iranians in the 1980s. He has personally been sanctioned by most of the world, including the United States, who cannot even legally talk to him.

Meanwhile, Raisi calls himself a defender of human rights when asked about the mass executions. The guy is a world-class war criminal. He ran the death panel that sentenced and executed tens of thousands of political prisoners at the end of the 1980s. He is now the leader of the world’s most notorious state sponsor of terrorism.

The first thing we have to know about Ebrahim Raisi is that these charges of mass murder as far as the Iranian mullahs are concerned, are not a problem but rather they are a bonus. It’s not that they picked him in spite of his terrible record. They picked him because of his terrible record.

Domestically, the ayatollah is sending a message to the Iranian people who remain discontented in large part with the Islamic regime. The message is simply put, “ you are not going to be able to dissent. There will be no ability to protest. Anybody who expresses any kind of public disagreement, it’s very clear what kind of treatment they’re going to get with Ebrahim Raisi as the President of Iran.”

Keep in mind, Raisi was not elected. He was selected. He was selected by the supreme leader of Iran, who is the real power in the country, and he is going to execute the policies of the supreme leader. The supreme leader’s disposition toward his own people and toward the world is revealed by the person he selects to be the President of Iran.

By picking Raisi, Ayatollah Khamenei is not only showing that he’s going to crack down harshly on dissent within Iran, but he’s showing that he understands that with Biden’s handlers running the United States, that the United States is weak, is not going to stand up to him and this is his time to step up Iran’s support for terrorism worldwide, supporting Hamas, supporting Hezbollah, supporting Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

The Iranian regime has also in the past supported al-Qaida and the Taliban, and other jihadi groups as well as and this is much less known. It’s clear that Iran understands that leftism is corrosive to Western civilization, and they want to destroy Western civilization. Therefore Iran will support both the leftists and the Islamists around the world who are anti-America and anti-Israel.

From now on, we can expect to see increased belligerence on the part of Iran. And Raisi’s ascension to the presidency means that Iran is going to be strutting around and sponsoring terrorism around the world and cracking down on its own people within the country.

By Barry Nussbaum, Son of Auschwitz survivors, Founder American Truth Project, Foreign and Domestic Policy Commentator

Continue Reading
Subscribe For Free

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter below and never miss the latest videos. By providing your phone number, you are consenting to receive SMS/MMS msgs, including automated texts, to that number from American Truth Project. Msg&data rates may apply. Terms & Conditions/privacy policy apply TextTerms