Barry Nussbaum: Welcome to ATP Report. Today we are back with part two of the Islamification Infiltration of America with Phil Haney, as you know, a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security. Long-time involved in law enforcement, protecting our borders from invaders like we’re going to talk about today. And an expert on Islam in America and its terror networks around the world. Phil, thanks for coming back.
Philip Haney: You’re welcome. Thank you very much.
Barry Nussbaum: In our last episode, we ended with shocking news from you. And that news was at the conclusion of the Holy Land Foundation trial it was perceived by the public because law enforcement said so, that there were three organizations connected with this group whose leaders were sent to jail and are still in jail for supporting terror around the world and effectively running a network of fundraisers from Islamic groups across the country, taking in millions of dollars and sending it to the terror group Hamas, whose intention is to kill as many Jews as possible. When we left off, you said there were three organizations that were next to be picked up. Give us a quick summary of each one of those, would you, please, Phil?
Philip Haney: Yes, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which is in the news a lot, easy to look up, known as CAIR, originally founded in 1993. So how long ago was that? Twenty-five years, If my math is right and they’re still operating today. They go into the halls of Congress. They go to the State Department. Everywhere you turn in Washington; they’re showing up. They file lawsuits against law enforcement agencies, interfere with training programs. They were one of the three organizations that we referred to earlier that were meant to be part of phase two of the Holy Land trial. And that would have been initiated probably early 2009 if the Department of Justice lawyers had been allowed to go forward with their case. They had the evidence. It was already laid on the table. The judge approved it. And they were going to go forward with it. But then the administration changed right the same month, 2008, November everything changed. And immediately the Obama administration shut the case down. Shut it down. We’re not going to do it. Then the second organization was called the Islamic Society of North America. ISNA is still active today, as well. It originated in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, back in the 60s as a students organization and then as the number of Muslim students came to America, they began to restructure and grow and they formed a branch called Islamic Society of North America, which is very prominent in political affairs this very day. One of the past presidents is Imam Magid, who is in constant photo ops there in Washington with members of the FBI or other branches of the federal government as an outreach and dialogue partner. And then the third one is the more shadowy, but it’s actually no less influential than the first two, called the North American Islamic Trust or NAIT and they own the deeds, the titles to the real estate, the property and the buildings that are the mosques and the social buildings of these different Muslim organizations around the country. They hold it. And those were the three groups that were going to be the main focus of the second phase of the Holy Land trial.
Barry Nussbaum: So if you know or have a good idea, can you tell us why the Obama Justice Department stepped on part two and prevented it from going forward, even though the judge had seen the evidence and approved it?
Philip Haney: You might recall that Peter King from New York used to be the chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security. He wrote a letter asking that exact same question to Eric Holder. “Why have you not gone forward with the second phase of the Holy Land trial?” Can you guess what answer he received from Eric Holder?
Barry Nussbaum: Let us know.
Philip Haney: He didn’t even have the courtesy to respond to it. They just decided not to follow through with it. And then the chairmanship changed from Peter King to Michael McCaul. And now the chairman has changed again. We’re talking five, ten years now? There’s still been no effort, no focused effort to bring that trial back and re-initiated. So it was Eric Holder who was the DOJ and the attorney general under Barack Obama, who shut it down that we know, it’s part of history.
Barry Nussbaum: So give us a couple of minutes while we digest that horrible news. What has CAIR been up to since the Holy Land Foundation trial concluded?
Philip Haney: CAIR has, I use the word saturation, saturated into the three major arenas of our country, and that would be the social arena, in particular, the catalyst in that area is immigration reform. And they’ve attacked and have gone after immigration reform, calling it the Muslim ban. So in that area, they’re very visible. The second one is the political arena, and they’re very active in promoting pro-Islamic causes in whatever arena you want to discuss up to and including the State Department. And the third arena is law enforcement, and they constantly file lawsuits and send threatening letters to local law enforcement, sheriffs, and police that want to have training about the threat and coerce and intimidate them into shutting the programs down. So every one of the major three arenas in our society CAIR is there exerting an inordinate amount of influence on the affairs of our country. And it’s unfortunate because they should have been shut down more than ten years ago. And that’s a point I would like to make, is that elected officials can’t say that they didn’t know because the Holy Land trial was a DOJ trial was very, very public. It wasn’t in a corner hidden somewhere. It was a national story. And so everybody in Congress, House, and Senate knew full well that this trial was going on. So for anybody from November of 2008 till now to continue to do business with CAIR, that’s a very, very serious issue that needs to be addressed. Why are they still involved with individuals and organizations that have been proven irrefutably in federal court to be tied directly not only to the Muslim Brotherhood but also to Hamas?
Barry Nussbaum: Unbelievable. We’re going to leave it there and bring you back for part three, and maybe you can answer that question for us. For now, thanks for joining us on the ATP Report. I would remind all of our loyal viewers out there to text the word TRUTH to 88202, and you will get signed up for our mailings. You’ll never pay anything for ATP materials. You’ll get our videos or articles almost on a daily basis so you can keep up right on your cell phone or if you’re more traditional, meaning you want it through the web just type in, FindBarry.com on your browser, that will take you to American Truth Project. You’ll be able to sign up there. Again, it’s always free. Special thanks to Phil Haney for joining us on ATP Report. I’m Barry Nussbaum.
Biden Helps Islamic Network of Kidnappers
Aynaz Anni Cyrus: Hello and welcome to ATP Report. I am Anni Cyrus. I’m coming to you today with so many different emotions running through me, so bear with me as I try to get through this.
You know, sometimes you feel like it just won’t get any scarier or more terrifying or disturbing than it could be? But yesterday, it did for me, and for, I would say, every single American out there. Let me get to it if you haven’t heard yet. Yesterday, a group of four people were indicted in America, in an American court, for plotting the kidnapping of an Iranian dissident, Masih Alinejad.
She is an Iranian American. A very important note here, she’s an American citizen. Okay, let’s very quickly look into this. So Masih Alinejad has been a very, very outspoken person in the media historically. She is a journalist, and she has been speaking out against the Islamic Republic of Iran regime’s behavior, and she has been trying to hold them accountable.
Based on all the evidence out now four people, four men Alireza Shavaroghi Farahani, Mahmoud Khazein, Kiya Sadeghi, and Omid Noori, have been indicted. It looks like they have been planning this kidnapping since 2018. All four of them leading you on, all four of them work for the Islamic Republic of Iran’s regime, Farahani is the head of the network.
It’s a network and Farahani is the head of the network. Do you know what kind of network it is? You guessed it. It’s the kind of network, a mafia or a gang that goes and kidnaps Iranians who are speaking out against the regime in any shape or form and then drags them back to Iran to stand trial. The latest victim of this mafia was Ruhollah Zem, who they ended up executing.
He was hung back in February of 2021. Now, this is scary, especially for people like me. I’m so very grateful that Masih is safe, at least for now, but I can’t even imagine how she’s feeling right now. But let me tell you where this gets even scarier. Number one, the very first question I have is, how is it that four Iranian operatives find their way to America and operate in detail with the surveillance of her house, her neighborhood, her family members?
They put together a plot, and we are all just (Anni whistling), who? This could possibly go back to, you know, why we need closed borders and a better system of letting people in. That’s just a biased personal opinion of mine. But here is where the second part of the interesting facts comes in. So, there’s a fifth person involved named Niloufar Bahadorifar. She is an Iranian who lives in America, in California.
Guess what? She’s the one who provided the money. She supported this network that is planning to kidnap an American citizen. She provided financial support. Let me take you back to your lovely, moderate, nice neighbor. I guess you never know who they are. Now, all of this, some of you could say, “Well, you know, it’s Iran. We all know their regime is crooked, and they have murderers for Presidents.”
But here’s where it gets so disturbing that I don’t know which side makes me sick to my stomach more as an Iranian or as an American. Just in case if you didn’t know, the same day, these four Iranians were indicted. They were indicted for trying to kidnap an American citizen: the Biden administration, the same day, the Biden administration waived certain sanctions on Iran’s oil transfer.
I’m going to read this part for you, and I’m going to let you see it on the screen. So, the waiver signed by Secretary of State Anthony Blinken allows the transfer of Iranian funds and restricted accounts to exporters in Japan and the Republic of Korea. According to notifications sent to Congress by the State Department, the wavier allows Iranian money that had been frozen as a result of American sanctions to be freed up without violating the law.
What is happening to our nation? What is happening to our country? What is happening to our beautiful America? As I said, as an Iranian American, I don’t know how I feel today. I’m going to be very honest with you. I haven’t slept since yesterday. I can’t wrap my head around the idea that my motherlands regime is sending their goons to snatch people like myself, pardon me, as I’m a little biased, and it scares me more than maybe a random person, to take them back to Iran so they can stand trial and be killed.
Or is it more disturbing that my now home, America, is run by such ruthless people that they reward this regime? They couldn’t wait for a couple of weeks to see where all these indictments go? Right? They couldn’t wait to see. No, they didn’t need to wait to see. They know. They know that every penny, all the way from one dollar to billions of dollars handed to this regime, is going to fund terrorism. Because, yes, a plot to kidnap an American citizen who is a human rights activist exposing the monster regime of Iran is terrorizing.
So, I’m going to leave you with this. Ladies and gentlemen, my fellow Iranians, my fellow Americans, my fellow humans, I need you to get involved. I need you to take action. We have got to save our beautiful nation before it turns into where I come from, that I call motherland, the hell known as the Islamic Republic of Iran.
One of the easiest ways you can get involved is to support us and join us here at the American Truth Project. All you got to do is either use our text alert system, text ANNI, A-N-N-I and send it to 88202. You will be signed up for free or go to our website, American Truth Project.org, and you can sign up via the email system. You get all of our materials, my videos, Barry Nussbaum, founder of ATP’s videos, that he does every day. You get all of our articles, everything.
We have the call to action. And last but not least, we are a 501(c)3, which means we always need your donations to continue doing what we do. While you’re on our website American Truth Project.org. you can consider making a 100% tax-deductible donation. On that note, keep your eyes open, follow the news with the Iran deal and the Iranian goons who are here to snatch American citizens simply because we are practicing our God-given freedom written in our Constitution in the First Amendment. Stay Safe, and goodbye.
Anni Cyrus on the infiltration of Sharia into American Courts
Barry Nussbaum: Hello, and welcome to ATP Report. I’m Barry Nussbaum. Before we bring on a very special guest. I want to remind all of you out in ATP Land. If you haven’t done so already, please take out your cell phone. Do us a favor, and text the message truth T-R-U-T-H and send it to 88202. You’ll be signed up for free in about three seconds for all of our ATP content, and it will come right to the palm of your hand in your cell phone, absolutely free.
So, I’ve got a surprise for you. Let me bring on Anni Cyrus, National Director of ATP and former child bride survivor from Iran, to talk about Islam with me today. This is going to be a good one. Hi, Anni.
Anni Cyrus: I, Barry. Yes, it’s going to be a tragic one, but a good one.
Barry Nussbaum: So, let’s just jump into it. You did a show the other day on your radio that has gotten some incredible responses. We thought it would be the best thing to follow up with you and me together because this is really important news that our viewers need to understand. It’s significant.
So, let’s talk about it. The Senate just confirmed a lifetime appointment for a Pakistani American Muslim federal judge. Who is he, and what can you tell me about him?
Anni Cyrus: Well, that’s a good question. I can’t tell you exactly who he is because there’s just so far you can go back to reading about him. Somewhere it stops, but that’s a different issue with him. He is Judge Quraishi. He was born in America to a Pakistani family, which are practicing Muslim, and he was raised a Muslim.
He practices Islam, and he was very proud to announce the history he made by being the first Muslim judge. Now, let me tell you why I have a problem with that because if being a federal judge comes secondary as pride, and being a Muslim is your first priority to be happy about, then you are telling me that you are very proud of your Islamic faith. That’s my very first red flag with him.
Barry Nussbaum: Well, let me jump into the conflict you’re referring to because I guarantee the majority of people watching today don’t understand that conflict you’re referring to. As I understand it, Allah and Mohammed are quoted as saying that followers of Islam cannot follow the laws or instructions of the nonbelievers if those instructions or laws contradict Sharia.
So, question one, Anni, is that true? Question two, which is much more important. What will this new judge do when the American laws he is sworn to uphold and interpret contradict his personal religious beliefs, and, as I understand it, its non-negotiable instructions?
Anni Cyrus: It’s very correct. Yes, you know me. Let me bring up Quran and Hadith. Many verses, many Hadiths, but I’m going to just give you one because we don’t have too much time. You open Quran to Chapter 33, and the very first verse says, ‘Oh, Prophet, fear Allah and do not obey the disbelievers and the hypocrites. Indeed, Allah is ever Knowing and Wise.’
Right there, who are the disbelievers? Non-Muslims. Now, if our audience wants to understand why disbelievers are non-Muslims, they can go to AmericaTruthProject.org and look up Anni Cyrus. I’ve done many videos explaining it.
Then we go to Hadith, where Mohammed said, “Narrated by Abdullah,” “Prophet Mohammed said, A Muslim must obey his leader, the law of the land, and the rules unless those rules are against Allah’s rules. If any of those laws and rules creates disobedience toward Allah, then that Muslim should not obey the leader.”
That one is on al-Bukhari, Book of Judgment, which is book 88, Hadith #258. Put those two together, no matter who you are, if you claim to be a Muslim, you should not follow any laws that go against Allah and Mohammed, which is Sharia. To answer your second question.
There are two possible scenarios. Judge Quraishi will follow Sharia and disobey our Constitution. Scenario number two, he will follow our Constitution and earn himself a fatwa to be killed under the law of Sharia.
Barry Nussbaum: That second answer, I mean, it sounds so silly, but it’s true, and you anticipated my next question. I was going to ask you to explain why this judge has no choice but not to follow U.S. Law. He’s got a death penalty hanging over his head.
Can you explain what that means and what is there in Sharia that could be in the back of this judge’s mind? If he has to render a decision where he’s in conflict with Sharia vs. U.S. Constitution? Oh, my God, which way do I go?
Anni Cyrus: Well, I’ll tell you what, before I answer that, Barry, let me say this. You said if there is a conflict. I guarantee you there will be conflict because here are a very few of hundreds of possible conflicts. Under Islam, under Sharia, there is no such thing as freedom of religion.
Our First Amendment gives us freedom of religion, right there, conflict. Suppose this judge is ever in a position to make a judgment between a Muslim and non-Muslim. By Sharia, he has to side with the Muslims. That goes against us, and that is discrimination. If he ever has to make a judgment between Islamic law, being Sharia, that applies to freedom of the press, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, or anything that would say or discriminate against Mohammed and Islam he will have no choice but to side with Sharia.
If he doesn’t in Quran and in the Hadith, it says, if any Muslim ever turns their back to Allah, Mohammed, and Sharia, they shall be killed. The exact term is to be beheaded. The punishment in Quran for someone who turns away from Islam is beheading.
Barry Nussbaum: Lovely, now let’s get heavy with a history lesson about my favorite American president, Thomas Jefferson, and this is really important because I’m going to tie it together with one of your favorite new people, Rashida Tlaib. In 1786, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson met with the Arab diplomats from Tunisia, who were in the process of waging war against a brand-new American country.
They would seize ships, grab the sailors, imprison the ones that lived, and sell them back to the United States or sell them into slavery. So that’s how they made a living. And the United States before it launched a war on the Barbary pirates, that’s what they were called. They met with the ambassador and wanted to know why they were doing this.
Thomas Jefferson just could not understand why they would be attacking a country that had done nothing to them, and Jefferson wrote extensively about this. He just couldn’t understand it. So, what happened? Well, the ambassador basically told Jefferson it’s their duty under Islam as being instructed by Sharia to wage war on all of mankind who don’t believe.
In other words, they were sinners, and it was their right and duty to wage war upon them wherever they could be found and, ‘make slaves of all they could take prisoners.’ And every Muslim who was slain in battle was sure to go to paradise. So, my first question. That was 1786. We’re in 2021. Does Islam still believe what that ambassador told Thomas Jefferson?
Anni Cyrus: Do you want better, Barry? Since fourteen hundred years ago, Islam is the same. Fourteen hundred years ago, Mohammad told his army of Muslims that we’re going to walk through Medina and we’re going to walk through Mecca and anyone who’s not a Muslim who is not willing to convert to Islam, we will kill them, or we take their wives and daughters as sex slaves.
We take their properties and money, and we’re going to make them convert to Islam. Fourteen hundred years ago. Four hundred years ago, four days ago, four minutes ago, and four hundred years from today, it’s going to be the same.
Barry Nussbaum: Well, here’s the big question of the day. I think I know what you’re going to say, but I have to ask, for our audience. Rashida Tlaib is very vocal and upfront about the fact she is not a Christian. She’s a practicing Muslim. When she took the oath of office to be a United States congresswoman, she did not take the oath on the Bible.
She took the oath on the Quran and not just any Quran. She took the oath on Thomas Jefferson’s Quran. What Rashida Tlaib did not understand, because she apparently is not a historical person or has no value with the history of the United States. The reason Thomas Jefferson kept the Quran on his desk was he felt that this was an enemy of the new country, that unless they rejected the Quran, they would never be Americans. So, what does it mean when Tlaib swears in on the Quran instead of the Bible? Is it because she’s really making a statement that that’s where her loyalties lie?
Anni Cyrus: Well, before I directly answer you, which, you know, we have the same answer. When you said Tlaib is not a big fan of history, I would like to add something. Rashida Tlaib is a huge fan of made-up history. If she didn’t know anything about history, I wouldn’t mind. But she’s a big fan of made-up history that she spreads every day.
And you know what I’m referring to. A Palestine history that is made up. That’s a different note. Yes, Rashida Tlaib is very openly a practicing Muslim. I might add a side note people if Rashida Tlaib lived in an actual Islamic country, she would be hanged because she doesn’t wear the hijab and she speaks loudly.
Both crimes under Sharia to be punished. Anyhow, she specifically took the oath on that Quran for two reasons. One, yes, she is going to obey Sharia regardless. She has done it to this day, Barry. Every time she said no to something was because it was anti-Islam. Every time she tried to push in a new law, it’s pro-Sharia.
And I think the other part of it was actually to disrespect our history by taking an oath on a Quran that was kept in that library to remind us of what we’re not supposed to do. And we ended up exactly doing that very wrong thing, which was giving power to Islamic Sharia, practicing people who hate us, and our Constitution ordered by their prophet and their Allah.
Barry Nussbaum: Well, that explains a lot because so many people cannot figure out why she just seems to hate America and why she seems to have a different agenda. And I think you just put your finger on it. It’s because she looks to another guide, then we do. We have the United States Constitution. She has the Quran.
Anni Cyrus: Exactly, and if anybody would ever listen to you, Barry, or me and read the Quran, they would see that more than fifty-one percent of the Quran is an explanation on how to deal with non-Muslims.
Here are the ways you deal with them in the Quran: make them second-class citizens and bury them under Islamic taxes until they don’t have the money to pay anymore. Then give them an option to convert and if they don’t kill them. That is how the Quran is. Fifty-one percent of the Quran.
Barry Nussbaum: Well, that explains a lot, and it’s an explanation that I think is the underlying cause for her, what seems to be irrational statements on a daily basis and the pushing of a narrative that I think she’s making up as she goes along. Anni, thanks so much for coming on. We’ve got to continue this discussion. There’s so much we need to educate people on and tying it together with current political events that make no sense all of a sudden start making sense.
And it’s not good news, but we need to be arming our people with knowledge because knowledge is power. And ignorance of this, the underlying motivation for people that don’t like you, don’t like me, don’t like America, and certainly don’t like our way of life. Now, it makes more sense. For those of you out there ATP Land, I want to admonish you one more time.
Please sign up, get all of Anni Cyrus and me and everybody else, all of our guests, for free on your phone by simply texting the word TRUTH to 88202. For Anni Cyrus, I’m Barry Nussbaum. Thanks for joining us on ATP Report.
Ilhan Omar’s Family Wants A Communist Revolution In America
Barry Nussbaum: Hello and welcome to ATP Report. I’m Barry Nussbaum. Our wonderful guest back today is an investigative journalist and congressional candidate, Laura Loomer, joining us from across the globe. Welcome back, Laura.
Laura Loomer: Thanks for having me.
Barry Nussbaum: So, let’s begin by talking about the daughter of your favorite Congresswoman, Ilhan Omar. I’m referring to Isra Hirsi, her 18-year-old daughter, who fancies herself a climate activist and a communist. She has just added the communist hammer and sickle to her Twitter bio, and she’s openly calling, get this, for a communist revolution.
She co-founded the US Youth Climate Strike and has gotten just fawning coverage from the press. So, this self-styled communist revolutionary also writes her mom’s tweets in some cases, and she espouses communism that killed well over one hundred million people in the last century. So, is her mom a communist, too?
Laura Loomer: So, what’s interesting here is what we see playing out is what’s called the Red-Green Alliance or the Marxist Jihadi Alliance. And so, you see Marxists and communists, they form, and they have been forming these deep ties and alliances to these jihadi Muslims like Ilhan Omar because they share the same end goal, which is ultimately the downfall of Western civilization and the erosion and destruction of the American constitution and American values. And so, it’s no surprise to me that Ilhan Omar, who is a jihadist and of course, we know that her daughter shares her jihadi views and sentiments because she herself has posted tweets in the past praising Muslim Brotherhood officials and also advocating in support of the violent rioters in Minneapolis in Antifa and BLM many of whom are Somali radical Muslim migrants.
And this isn’t the first time her daughter has had some controversy with regards to her own Twitter account. If you recall, during the BLM riots in Minneapolis, when rioters and domestic terrorists were threatening to burn down the police station. Her daughter actually tweeted and called on comrades to bring supplies to the anarchists who were trying to burn down the Minneapolis police department. And so, I would say that just like her mother, she’s a Marxist jihadist.
Barry Nussbaum: So, Laura, explain this to me because I’m just too dense to follow. How is it possible that people like you and me know about this, and it’s not in the press? She literally wants to destroy America, not dissimilar from her own mother. She’s calling for a communist overthrow of the United States government, and the press just loves her.
Laura Loomer: Yeah, well, of course, the press shares the same values as Ilhan Omar., right? Just last week, what was the press doing? They were cheerleaders for Hamas, just like Ilhan Omar. We found out that the Associated Press and Reuters and Al-Jazeera, and other media entities were actually sharing office space with Hamas’s terrorists.
When I went to Minnesota, I confronted Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, and I asked them to condemn Hamas. They refused to do it. So, it’s no surprise that the media is going to be praising not only the Jew-hating, Hamas-loving, terrorist-supporting congresswoman but also her spawn who espouse and share the same radical Marxist jihadist viewpoints. And what I find to be really funny about this whole situation is that apparently, right? Apparently, the Ivy League institutions of our country, they have so much animosity towards white people.
They have so much animosity towards conservatives. But if you’re a Marxist jihadist like Ilhan Omar’s daughter, where is she going to be going to school? Well, she’s going to be attending Columbia University. And an interesting fact about Columbia University that some people may not know. In 2015, and I’m sure it’s only gotten worse since then.
David Horowitz’s Freedom Center released a report about the most anti-Semitic universities in the country, and he found that Cornell and Columbia were some of the top two most anti-Semitic colleges, universities in America. So, it’s no surprise that the Jew-hating Muslim congresswoman’s daughter will be attending an anti-Semitic school.
Barry Nussbaum: Well, we, you, and I, will keep mentioning it. So, speaking of Hamas, Laura. In the month of May, I know this number is staggering, Hamas launched over 4,000 explosive rockets into Israel, targeting exclusively civilian populations to create the maximum amount of damage, deaths, and terror.
So, after they were starting to run low on rockets, well, they started demanding a cease-fire to the war that they started unilaterally. Israel agreed. And now there’s a cease-fire. Here’s what I really don’t get. Maybe you can explain it to me. Hamas starts a war. Israel defends itself and strikes Hamas military targets in Gaza almost exclusively. Now the world is lining up to send boatloads of cash to Hamas.
So far, over a billion dollars in aid has been pledged. Including a very big pile of money from Joe Biden’s White House. Why is the world responding like this? Literally, giving gifts based on terror created by the terrorists?
Laura Loomer: Because they want to see the eradication and the destruction of Israel, and so Joe Biden, of course, it would be very radical, right? It would be extremely radical for Joe Biden in his position as the illegitimate installed so-called President of the United States to call for all aid to Israel to be cut off because traditionally it’s been a bipartisan agreement to give aid and assistance to Israel, our greatest ally in the Middle East.
One of the first things that Joe Biden did, of course, upon assuming office was he eradicated the travel ban to radical Islamic countries and then immediately reinstalled aid to the Palestinians, which was something that was reversed during the Trump administration out of respect for the Tailor Force Act because the Palestinians were using American aid to reward and give stipends to the family members of terrorists who murdered American citizens and Israelis.
And so, what this is, is it’s just a way for the Democrats and global leaders to without overtly saying we are going to give money to Hamas, right? Which you cannot do. Because Hamas is recognized as a designated Islamic terrorist organization in our country, they’re just going to give this aid for development purposes.
But we all know it’s not a coincidence the aid is going to go towards purchasing more rockets. And when you do the math of the 4,000 rockets that were fired into Israel, I wonder what the mathematical breakdown is?
How many rockets can you purchase with 235 million dollars? Because it’s not a coincidence that Hamas was able to fire 4,000 rockets directly after receiving 235 million dollars in aid from Joe Biden.
Barry Nussbaum: Well, the analysis I read out of Israel says those rockets cost at the maximum, the long-range rockets, Laura, $500. So, 200 million divided by 500, you get a gazillion rockets.
Laura Loomer: Well, we know that it’s not just going to end with firing rockets out of Gaza into Israel. Of course, the leaders of Hamas just released a statement the other day saying that they have 10,000-foot soldiers on the ground in Israel.
So, they’re talking about how they have Hamas’s terrorists who have infiltrated Israeli society, Israeli communities, and who knows what they’re going to do. But they clearly aren’t just going to stop firing rockets from Gaza into Israel.
Barry Nussbaum: So, Israel pulled out of Gaza in 2005. And one of the talking points that the famous people were parroting as if it was a fact. What do you expect? Gaza is occupied territory. There’s not one single Jew living there. Not one single Israeli soldier. Not one single Israeli inside the territory, except for a couple of dead bodies of soldiers that Hamas refuses to return so they can be buried with the rest of their families in cemeteries in Israel.
Why in the world is that a talking point, not ridiculed in the press? It is the opposite, literally the definitional opposite of occupied territory. It’s been abandoned by Israel to the Hamas government.
Laura Loomer: Well, the press is inherently left-leaning. Right? And we know that the Democrat Party, as President Trump has famously said, ‘Is the party of Jew-haters and Israel-haters.’ We know that the press in America is a propaganda arm for the Democrat Party. We know that they are terrorist sympathizers.
And now, thanks to what just happened in Israel, with this conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, we learned, and we have evidence that American and foreign media entities that constantly demonize and falsely accused Israel of being an apartheid state or call Gaza occupied territory, they were literally sharing office space with Hamas’s terrorists.
And then they denied it. They denied it. And then, when there are calls for an investigation, the secretary of state said there wasn’t any evidence. Well, how do you rule out the evidence if you’re not even going to do an investigation? And so, it’s beyond just ignorance at this point in time.
I’m sure a lot of these people have been to Israel, if they haven’t, they can go for themselves and see. That there’s no such thing as apartheid or occupation when you have Muslims serving in the military in Israel. When you have Muslims serving in the Knesset, right? When you have Muslims integrated into society, working alongside, educating their children with, and participating in society with other Israeli Jews.
But, you know, it’s far more sinister than that because they are quite literally sharing space and breaking bread with terrorists. As we just learned two weeks ago.
Barry Nussbaum: Absolutely. So, in a similar vein, discussing the United States foreign policy, Iran is now enriching uranium to levels that only countries building nuclear weapons use. In other words, there is 60 percent enrichment, where if you’re using uranium for civilian purposes, you’re at two to three percent.
So, Iran is enriching uranium at 20 times civilian uses. So obviously, they’re building nuclear weapons. It’s no longer a secret, and nobody disputes it. So why in the world, if you have any idea, is America begging Iran to come back to the JCPOA so Iran can be removed from the sanctioned bad boy list and start receiving billions in funds coming in, starting with a big check from Joe Biden’s White House? Why are we doing that in the face of our weapons program?
Laura Loomer: This goes back to what I described as the Marxist jihadi alliance, okay? These people are working hand in hand to destroy Western civilization, to destroy American values, and to eradicate Israel. Those are their top three goals. And their fourth goal, of course, is to establish a global Islamic caliphate. But what does Joe Biden do?
Well, he gives the Palestinians 235 million dollars in aid. Right? He ends the travel ban to radical Islamic nations, opening our borders so that these radicals can come here and further destabilize our country. Now, another one of the first things he did upon assuming office was called for re-engagement with Iran and re-negotiations, as you just said.
The only reason to engage with people who chant ‘Death to America’ and ‘Death to Israel,’ and I’ve stated on numerous occasions; their plan to use nuclear weapons or nuclear technology to eradicate Israel, to kill Jews, and to kill Americans to help them complete their goal. And it’s very sinister what is happening right now. And this is something that Barack Hussein Obama did, right?
As our first Muslim President. He himself obviously had a lot of sympathies towards these Islamists and the Marxist jihadist alliance. He really catalyzed this concept of civilization, jihad. Which we’re watching unfold in our country right now. And the Joe Biden administration, as I’ve said numerous times before, is just a third term extension of the Barack Hussein Obama administration. And we’re watching it before our eyes.
Barry Nussbaum: Laura, thanks for coming on today. Where can people follow you and learn about what you’re doing?
Laura Loomer: Well, people can go to my website, Loomered.com, that’s Loomered.com. I’m also running for Congress in Florida’s 21st congressional district, which is the most Jewish district in America. And if people want to learn more about my campaign, they can go to Laura Loomer for Congress.com. You won’t be able to find me on social media because I’m banned everywhere. But you can go to my website and send me an email.
Barry Nussbaum: For those of you out there in ATP land that haven’t yet subscribed to our text message alert system, please do that now. It’s very simple. Just take your cell phone, type the message TRUTH, and send it to the number 88202. You’ll be signed up for free. You’ll get all of our content on your cell phone absolutely free, including everything we do with Laura Loomer. For ATP Report, thanks for joining us. I’m Barry Nussbaum.